Well, you're helping make my point for me. In the PWS world, they're not even in the same zip code. That's like me trying to justify my VP2 against RMY equipment, which frankly compares more favorably than what you're suggesting. If the word "far" is over the top for you, so be it, I find it accurate as a whole.Too bad the VP2 crowd probably will not even acknowledge this newcomer.Seriously? Why would we? Just because our 31's have a humidity problem, yours won't even go lower than 10%. At least Davis products can, which is a rather big deal for some of us. The fact is that every parameter of the VP2 is far superior to anything this product (or anything from this maker) offers, other than bells and whistles. If you want to lay your "framework" on why the VP2 is so overrated because of mishandled sensors causing some humidity issues, you go right ahead. Just to be clear, I merely post this so your remarks don't confuse PWS newbies on what's what, not to defend Davis, it is what it is.
BTW, since in the PWS world "all in ones", like this, are desirable,I'd take a Vue in a heartbeat.
The VP2 is no doubt a better station but is in no way far superior. Far superior in build quality ( Although I have not seen one in person, I would give it the nod ) but not in accuracy. Better yes but not far superior.
I'd take a Vue in a heartbeat.All I suggest is that people do their homework, (it literally took me years to pull the trigger on my VP2 against it's only true competitor, Rainwise), and simply not let peoples uneducated opinions do it for them.