For sure. I always wondered why the full range is not taken advantage of, albeit not as accurate, but better than nothing for us desert dwellers.Quit blaming the SHT30, it's not the sensor's issue, it's the PWS's.SHT30 temp/hum sensor can't provide you with accurate sub 10% humidity and dew point.I know it is possible with the GW1000. The GW1000 is like Acurite's Access. You can access the weather sensor data without a console.
Oh H*** no! The GW1000 has two methods of getting data from it. "Customized server" and local API which Meteobridge and Weather-Display software take advantage of. Acurite provides no way of getting data from the Access. I know it is possible to get data from the Access but it involves DNS hacking trickery or WU packet interception as methods done by Acuparse and WeeWx. Acurite has done nothing to help their customers get their data from the Access.
This is exactly why I lost all interest in the AcuRite Atlas and started looking at Ecowitt. I want my data when and where I want it.
Okay. Good point. I'll work with Fine Offset and find out if they can stop blocking sub 10% RH.
↧
Re: Poll: Should Ambient/Ecowitt do the following...
↧
